OC Media

OC Media

  • Home
  • News Stories
  • Feature Stories
    • Conflict
    • Environment
    • Gender
    • Investigation
    • Labour
    • Minorities
    • Society
  • Voices
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Join us
  • About us
    • Partners
  • ruРусский

Analysis | Institutions need to replace personality in Georgian politics

14 January 2019 by CRRC

Этот пост доступен на языках: Русский

CRRC-Georgia examines the trust in political insti­tu­tions in Georgia, and what that might mean for Georgian democracy.

A fair amount of schol­ar­ship indicates that (dis)trust in political insti­tu­tions provides an indi­ca­tion of how well those insti­tu­tions work. Hence, trust in political insti­tu­tions is an important indicator of the func­tion­ing of a demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­ern­ment.

Following this line of logic, one would expect that trust in insti­tu­tions reflects the public’s trust in who runs them. Data from CRRC’s Caucasus Barometer from 2011 to 2017 supports this argument.

Overall, the data indicate that trust in political insti­tu­tions has declined in Georgia since 2011. None of the political insti­tu­tions asked about on the Caucasus Barometer (the president, local gov­ern­ment, executive gov­ern­ment, par­lia­ment, and political parties) received as high a level of trust on the 2017 Caucasus Barometer as on the 2011 or 2012 versions of the survey.

While trust has declined overall, relative levels of trust have largely been in sync with the changes of power in the country.

After the Georgian Dream party came to power in 2012, there was an increase in trust towards the executive gov­ern­ment (from 39% to 48%) and par­lia­ment (from 37% to 44%), the two insti­tu­tions that changed political lead­er­ship.

Trust in the president continued to decline from 58% in 2011 to 28% in 2012, and 23% in 2013. All of these surveys were done while Mikheil Saakashvili was still president.

Trust in the president grew in 2015, the first Caucasus Barometer after the 2013 pres­i­den­tial elections, which ended Mikheil Saakashvili’s pres­i­den­cy and brought Giorgi Margve­lashvili to office.

Public trust in local gov­ern­ment did not follow the same logic as the executive gov­ern­ment, par­lia­ment, and the pres­i­den­cy. Even though Georgian Dream won the 2014 local elections, trust in local gov­ern­ment did not change between 2013 and 2015.

This could be due to the rel­a­tive­ly weak public expec­ta­tions of local gov­ern­ment. Indeed, in 2013, only 4% of the public reported they had attended a local gov­ern­ment meeting in the last year on a CRRC/TI survey. Besides low expec­ta­tions, many local gov­ern­ment officials had defected from the UNM to GD in the years since the change of power. Hence, it is not clear that the elections truly marked a change of power.

At the same time, that trust in local gov­ern­ment did not increase, trust towards executive author­i­ties and the par­lia­ment declined as the popular glow sur­round­ing Georgian Dream wore away. Trust towards the executive fell from 48% in 2012 to 26% in 2017. While 44% trusted par­lia­ment in 2012, trust fell to 22% in 2017.

Meanwhile, trust in President Margve­lashvili continued to grow, which might be attrib­ut­able to his de facto oppo­si­tion to the ruling party, without defection to the oppo­si­tion United National Movement Party (UNM).

Trust in political parties has remained low and showed little change from year to year. It declined between 2011 and 2015, yet trust in political parties does not appear to follow the electoral cycle as trust in insti­tu­tions con­trolled by specific parties appears to.

Growing public mistrust toward political insti­tu­tions in Georgia is a sign of weak state insti­tu­tions in the country. Renewed optimism and trust in insti­tu­tions appear to follow changes in political lead­er­ship, but without strong insti­tu­tion-building processes, optimism turns into dis­ap­point­ment.

While Georgian democracy has made con­sis­tent progress for the last three decades, tran­si­tion­ing from per­son­al­i­ty to policy-driven politics remains a challenge for Georgia’s demo­c­ra­t­ic con­sol­i­da­tion.

This article was written by Kristina Vacharadze, Pro­grammes Director at CRRC-Georgia. The opinions expressed in the article do not represent the views of CRRC-Georgia or any related entity.

To explore the data further, visit CRRC's Online Data Analysis tool.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Comments

comments

Filed Under: Opinion & Analysis Tagged With: crrc, georgia, georgian dream, institutions, mikheil saakashvili, poll, unm

Read more:

  • Dozens protest in Batumi against ‘uncontrolled’ construction projects
  • Georgia took ‘no steps’ for women’s empowerment in 2 years for EU AA
  • Georgian National Bank orders TBC to remove board leaders
  • მოსაზრება | ფარული შიმშილი — კარს მომდგარი ეპიდემია
  • Georgian President in disagreement with government over exclusion from security council

Editor’s pick

In pictures |  Nowhere else to go: the stories of Yerevan’s homeless

In pictures | Nowhere else to go: the stories of Yerevan’s homeless

Armine Avetisyan

There is one shelter in the city, with a capacity of 100, but it is not enough to house the hundreds living on Yerevan’s streets.

In pictures

Load More...Follow on Instagram
Voice from the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict | ‘I am not convinced, even now, that everything is over’

Voice from the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict | ‘I am not convinced, even now, that everything is over’

‘My Soviet childhood was very happy. I thought that my whole life would be like a fairy tale. But the fairy tale ended abruptly.’

More Voices

Interview | De Waal: ‘Is it time to come up with a bigger offer to Abkhazia?’

Interview | De Waal: ‘Is it time to come up with a bigger offer to Abkhazia?’

Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, a London-based think tank.

More Interviews

Opinion | Accepting our past is the only way we can move forward

Opinion | Accepting our past is the only way we can move forward

Javid Agha

In Azer­bai­jan, as in Armenia, remem­brance of the victims of past atroc­i­ties often takes on a one-sided nature.

More Opinion & Analysis

Subscribe to our biweekly newsletter:

OC Media
Follow us on:

Join us

Copyright © 2019 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • enEnglish
  • ruРусский