OC Media

OC Media

  • Home
  • News Stories
  • Feature Stories
    • Conflict
    • Environment
    • Gender
    • Investigation
    • Labour
    • Minorities
    • Society
  • Voices
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Join us
  • About us
    • Partners
  • ruРусский

Ingushetia crisis deepens as protesters demand resignation of head

12 October 2018 by Aznaur Tashayev

Этот пост доступен на языках: Русский

Protests in Magas (Screen­shot /MixNews)

A political crisis in the Russian Republic of Ingushetia is con­tin­u­ing over a border agreement with neigh­bour­ing Chechnya. Protests entered their ninth day in the Ingush capital Magas on Friday, with demands for repealing the agreement, a ref­er­en­dum, and the res­ig­na­tion of Ingush Head Yunus-Bek Yevkurov.

On Wednesday, Ingush jour­nal­ists and activists told OC Media that police had issued search warrants for three of the protest organ­is­ers: chair of the protest committee Musa Malsagov, chair of the teips (clans) council Malsag Uzhakhov, and oppo­si­tion activist from local organ­i­sa­tion Mekhk-Qel, Ismail Sultygov.

A criminal case was also opened against Malsagov for ‘publicly insulting’ Zyal­imkhan Yevloyev, the Chairman of the Gov­ern­ment of Ingushetia.

Since Monday, several MPs in Ingushetia’s par­lia­ment, the People's Assembly, have repeat­ed­ly tried to convene to repeal the the 4 October vote approving the border change. The MPs said the results of the vote were falsified.

These votes have so far failed due to a lack of quorum, with each time 10–12 of 32 MPs attending voting — less than the minimum 17 MPs required.

Protester Yakub Gogiyev told OC Media that the some MPs weren’t showing up to vote due to pressure from Ingush Head Yunus-Bek Yevkurov.

[Read about the beginning of the protests on OC Media: Protests erupt in Ingushetia as MPs say Chechnya land swap vote was falsified]

Protests in Magas on 4 October (Aznaur Tashayev /OC Media)

Support from outside Ingushetia

On Sunday, the fourth day of the protests, Ingushetia’s first president Ruslan Aushev arrived to to support pro­test­ers.

Aushev remains a highly respected figure in the republic, and the number of pro­test­ers increased after his arrival.

Speaking at the rally, Aushev said the author­i­ties should take ‘the people’s opinion’ into account, including by holding a ref­er­en­dum. Aushev said that the Ingush lead­er­ship made a mistake by signing the border agreement without con­sult­ing the people.

On the same day, activists from neigh­bour­ing republics also arrived to Ingushetia to address the pro­test­ers.

Valery Khatazhukov, a human rights activist from Kabardino-Balkaria, said that ‘the entire North Caucasus is closely following what is happening in Ingushetia’. According to him, the Ingush protest could set a precedent for the North Caucasus or even the whole of Russia.

‘This is a case where all peoples of the North Caucasus should say — there will be no violence here’, Khatazhukov said.

According to Kabardian nation­al­ist activist Ibragim Yaganov, the Ingush protests have become a historic moment for the entire North Caucasus and Russia.

‘For the first time in Russia’s recent history, the people, along with the main branches of the gov­ern­ment, came together to defend their interests’, he said.

Yaganov said that despite both the Russian and the Soviet con­sti­tu­tions saying that power belongs to the people, ‘we have been living in a com­plete­ly different way — people never decided anything’.

‘Last straw’

On Monday, a del­e­ga­tion of Ingush oppo­si­tion activists and gov­ern­ment officials met Aleksandr Matovnikov, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive to the North Caucasus.

The meeting was also attended by the Chechen Speaker of Par­lia­ment and Chechen Head Ramzan Kadyrov’s right hand — Magomed Daudov — and Chechnya’s mufti, Salakh Mezhiyev.

The Ingush del­e­ga­tion reit­er­at­ed their demand for the Ingush gov­ern­ment to comply with the con­sti­tu­tion and hold a ref­er­en­dum on the border agreement, while Daudov said that the Chechen side didn’t need ‘even a metre of Ingush land’ and was ready to come to Ingushetia for further dis­cus­sions.

Ingush oppo­si­tion MP Musa Abadiyev, who took part in the meeting, wrote on Facebook that the Russian author­i­ties did not expect such strong oppo­si­tion to the border agreement.

He wrote that the Ingush del­e­ga­tion raised griev­ances about high levels of unem­ploy­ment and cor­rup­tion in Ingushetia as well as over Prig­orod­ny District, a chunk of land lost to North Ossetia following the 1944 depor­ta­tions.

He said that the agreement struck by Ingush head Yunus-Bek Yevkurov and Chechen head Ramzan Kadyrov was ‘the last straw in people’s patience’.

One protest leader told OC Media that Yevkurov, having signed the agreement, had become a ‘political corpse’, but it was too early to speculate whether the Russian lead­er­ship would leave him in power or opt for his res­ig­na­tion.

He said that even if he were to resign early, Yevkurov wouldn’t leave his post before the res­o­lu­tion of the conflict, as it would be widely received as a sign of weakness in Russia’s lead­er­ship.

What’s in the deal

Mass protests erupted in Magas on 4 October, the day of the vote in Ingushetia’s People's Assembly approving the border agreement. Several MPs announced that the vote was rigged, while the Ingush Con­sti­tu­tion­al Court declared the deal uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and demanded a ref­er­en­dum.

According to the bill, a part of Ingushetia’s Sunzha District will be handed over to Chechnya. The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, has claimed the disputed area to be part of Chechnya’s Galan­chozh District.

As of 12 October, the full text of the new law hasn’t been published on the website of Ingushetia’s National Assembly and it remains unclear how much land will be swapped between the two republics.

Chechen author­i­ties have openly claimed ter­ri­to­ries in eastern Ingushetia for a number of years, despite a 1993 Chechen–Ingush agreement that left most of Sunzha District within Ingushetia.

The Chechen claims, which refer to Soviet maps from the 1930s, continued even after Ingush President Murat Zyazikov and Chechen President Akhmat-Khadzhi Kadyrov (the father of the current leader, Ramzan Kadyrov) confirmed the existing borders in 2003.

Between 1936–1993, Chechnya and Ingushetia existed as the Chechen–Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and the border between them was not demar­cat­ed.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Comments

comments

Filed Under: News Stories Tagged With: border, border agreement, chechnya, crisis, ingushetia, magas, protest, referendum, russia, yunus-bek yevkurov

Read more:

  • Georgia took ‘no steps’ for women’s empowerment in 2 years for EU AA
  • Georgian National Bank orders TBC to remove board leaders
  • მოსაზრება | ფარული შიმშილი — კარს მომდგარი ეპიდემია
  • Georgian President in disagreement with government over exclusion from security council
  • Armenia sends military ‘humanitarian mission’ to Syria

Editor’s pick

In pictures |  Nowhere else to go: the stories of Yerevan’s homeless

In pictures | Nowhere else to go: the stories of Yerevan’s homeless

Armine Avetisyan

There is one shelter in the city, with a capacity of 100, but it is not enough to house the hundreds living on Yerevan’s streets.

In pictures

Load More...Follow on Instagram
Voice from the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict | ‘I am not convinced, even now, that everything is over’

Voice from the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict | ‘I am not convinced, even now, that everything is over’

‘My Soviet childhood was very happy. I thought that my whole life would be like a fairy tale. But the fairy tale ended abruptly.’

More Voices

Interview | De Waal: ‘Is it time to come up with a bigger offer to Abkhazia?’

Interview | De Waal: ‘Is it time to come up with a bigger offer to Abkhazia?’

Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, a London-based think tank.

More Interviews

Opinion | Accepting our past is the only way we can move forward

Opinion | Accepting our past is the only way we can move forward

Javid Agha

In Azer­bai­jan, as in Armenia, remem­brance of the victims of past atroc­i­ties often takes on a one-sided nature.

More Opinion & Analysis

Subscribe to our biweekly newsletter:

OC Media
Follow us on:

Join us

Copyright © 2019 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • enEnglish
  • ruРусский