Georgian-Belarusian security cooperation deal worries political emigres in Georgia

26 August 2021
Belarusian activist with unfurled white-red-white stripe flag that Belarusian authorities have effectively banned, in Tbilisi. Image: Belarus Freedom, Georgian Solidarity Facebook page. 

A year after disputed presidential elections in Belarus, a Georgian-Belarusian security cooperation agreement has come into force. Critics fear that the treaty could help Minsk target political dissidents currently residing in Georgia.

Belarusians that had fled to Georgia in the repressive aftermath of the disputed 2020 election in Belarus have voiced concern about a cooperation agreement between Georgia’s State Security Service (SSSG) and the State Security Committee of Belarus (KGB) that has entered into force this month.

With the agreement, the two countries are to regularly exchange information, including personal data of interested parties, to cooperate in the fight against ‘terrorism’, ‘corruption’ and a number of other crimes, including those committed 'against the constitutional order, sovereignty and territorial integrity’ of the signatory countries.

The deal also includes cooperation in the fight against ‘transnational organised crime and international crime posing a threat to state security'. 

Within the cooperation on these matters, Article 8.1 of the Agreement envisages sending ‘representatives/attachés’ to the partner country ‘for a definite or an indefinite period’. 

The Belarus-Georgian agreement came into force on 1 August, days before Lukashenka's critics marked the anniversary of last year’s presidential election, held on 9 August 2020, and weeks after the European Union targeted the Belarus regime with harder sanctions in response to an intensified crackdown on civil society organisations.

Aleskey Karpeka, a  Belarusian journalist working for independent Belarusian outlet European Radio for Belarus, called the recent Belarusian-Georgian treaty ‘unpleasant’ news. 


He told OC Media that he estimates at least 100 Belarusians are currently in Georgia for political reasons. 

‘Complete termination’

On 16 August, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, the exiled Belarusian opposition leader, appealed to the Georgian Foreign Ministry with a warning that Belarusian authorities used ‘anti-terror legislation’ against political opponents. 

‘Therefore, only the complete termination of the agreement will guarantee the security of Belarusians in Georgia’, Tsikhanouskaya stressed. 

Law enforcement and security agencies in Belarus have been repeatedly accused of launching politically motivated investigations to target government critics for years, designating, and outlawing the activities of, a number of civil groups, including media organisations,  who they labelled as ‘extremist’.

Dmitry Chernyh, Deputy Chairman of Belarusian Helsinki Committee told OC Media that the potential crimes that Georgia and Belarus agreed to jointly combat  — including terrorism and the financing of terrorism, as well as ‘crimes against the constitutional order, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state’ are those ‘that many activists of the Republic of Belarus are accused of’. 

‘We assume that the security of activists in Georgia will depend on what position Georgia will take regarding the political situation in Belarus’, he said. ‘If Georgia supports the current regime in its agenda with regard to activists, the activists hiding in Georgia will be under threat.’

On 16 August, a group of Belarusian emigres in Batumi, Georgia called on Georgian authorities to abstain from cooperating with the security services of Belarus. Image: Batumelebi.

‘Economic crimes’

‘Fortunately, the extradition is not mentioned there’, Belarusian journalist Aleskey Karpeka, who arrived in Georgia from Belarus in June, told OC Media. ‘However, the fact that the law enforcement agencies of Belarus will be able to get access to financial and other information of Belarusians in Georgia triggers negative emotions. Many won’t feel safe here anymore.’

According to activist Marisha Korzh, a Belarusian civil activist living in Georgia, Lukashenka’s government targeting Belarusians in Georgia with ‘extremist’ or ‘terrorist’ designations could be too obvious for the Georgian authorities to play along with.

Instead, according to Korzh, Belarusian authorities could go after their critics by smearing them as potentially involved in dealing drugs or avoiding taxes, in order to retrieve their personal financial information from their Georgian counterparts. They would then proceed to engineer criminal cases. 

Alyaksandr Lukashenka and Irakli Gharibashvili, during the Belarusian leader's visit to Georgia in April 2015. Image: gov.ge.

‘In this case, Georgia could actually send these people to Belarus without any sort of justification’, Kozh warned, and cited the criminal case against Ales Bialiatski, the Director of the Human Rights Center Viasna, a rights group active in Belarus. 

In 2011, Belarusian prosecutors charged Bialinski with tax evasion based on the financial information provided by Lithuania and Poland. Human Rights Watch has called the charges ‘unjustified and politically motivated’.

‘The KGB can be quite creative in this kind of thing and I think Georgian security services and the government have to be very very alert and really aware about the consequences of what can happen’, Korzh told OC Media

Human rights obligations

News of the treaty began to spread after it was published on state-run Belarusian legal portal Pravo on 13 August, with Polish news agency Belsat breaking the story later that day. Swift condemnations from government critics in Georgia as well as from Georgia’s ally countries quickly followed. 

‘By bringing into force the agreement with the authoritarian regime of Belarus, Georgia will grossly violate human rights, Georgian legislation and its obligations under international treaties’, the Tbilisi office of international rights group Human Rights House warned on 16 August.

The opposition parties Droa and European Georgia were among the first to condemn the treaty, with Droa stating that they were ‘horrified’ by it, European Georgia calling it ‘shameful’. The treaty was also criticised by Linas Linkevicius, former foreign minister of Lithuania, Estonian MEP  Marina Kaljurand and German MEP Viola Von Cramon.

Estonian President Kersti Kaljulaid meeting Belarusian leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya in Tallinn on 28 January. Image: Mattias Tammet/Office of the President of Estonia

‘Why does Georgia implement an agreement after five years in a situation where everyone else in the world gave up the cooperation with Belarus?’ Von Cramon wrote on Twitter. 

Former US Ambassador to Georgia Ian Kelly (2015-2018) also condemned the agreement. ‘You withdraw from an agreement brokered by the EU, and double down on this agreement. Prove to us you have not cast your lot with bloody authoritarian regimes. Withdraw’, he wrote on 16 August. 

[Read more on OC Media: Georgian Dream withdraws from EU-brokered deal with opposition]

In response to growing criticism SSSG claimed on 16 August that they were targeted with a campaign of ‘discreditation’. 

The SSSG also argued that Georgia already had similar treaties with the USA, UK and EU-member countries and that the agreement, originally signed in 2016,  would not oblige Georgia to act against its ‘state interests’. 

Vakhtang Gomelauri, who led the SSSG then and is currently Georgia's Interior Minister, and his then Belarusian counterpart, Valery Vakulchik, signing the agreement in December 2017 in Minsk. Photo: SSSG.

A provision in Article 5.6 of the Agreement states that each of the parties may ‘refuse to execute the request’ from another party if it contradicts ‘human rights’, ‘national legislation’  or  ‘international obligations’.

Amnesty International underlined in their 20 August statement that this ‘vaguely formulated clause’ left protection of human rights to the discretion of the security services of Belarus and Georgia. 

Given the ‘troubling human rights record’ of Belarus, the agreement, according to Amnesty International, ‘could potentially become yet another tool for Belarusian authorities to continue the harassment and intimidation of their critics abroad’.